"Emeritus" is not an official ASF designation. As far as the ASF is concerned, you're either a Committer, a PMC member, or both, or not at all.
The reason other projects use the emeritus designation is to avoid overstating active involvement. An "emeritus" member does not lose any privileges as far as ASF is concerned. If you want to remove privileges, I believe that the PMC has to vote to that effect. -Joey On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]>wrote: > If people have substantive questions (as opposed to requests for edits / > clarification), I'd rather they be here on the list. > > My main issue is the automatic transition to emeritus status for committers > / PMCs at 6 months. That's a significant change. Do we know what the > current impact of that would be? > > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Bill Havanki <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > I have some minor edits and some questions about it, which I'll add as > > comments in the doc. I also agree that a weather allowance is a good > idea. > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Mike Drob <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Thanks for putting it in a Google Doc, Arshak! > > > > > > What issues do y'all see with this document in it's current state? > > > Personally, I think it looks fine and would be willing to start a vote > on > > > it, but I get the impression that east coast weather has prevented some > > > folk from looking at it, so maybe another couple of days is fine. > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Arshak Navruzyan <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Oops, yes of course! It's editable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Bill Havanki < > > [email protected] > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > Thanks Arshak! Can you either allow editing or commenting? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Arshak Navruzyan < > [email protected] > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Say no more ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uR8vhIQcKGA6IEtbbF5D7UL_e6WGtfXMUQHp8Fwvg_E/edit?usp=sharing > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Christopher < > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps some ambitious volunteer could start a collaborative > > draft > > > of > > > > > > > Accumulo's bylaws in Google Docs or something, using ZK as a > > > starting > > > > > > > point. After it stabilizes a bit, we could push it to the > project > > > > > > > webpage as a draft and vote on it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Christopher L Tubbs II > > > > > > > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Mike Drob < > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > I didn't get that impression from reading their document. > > While C > > > > and > > > > > > PMC > > > > > > > > are two distinct roles, there is nothing stating that there > > > cannot > > > > be > > > > > > > > overlap, and the fact that there is 100% overlap is entirely > > > > > > orthogonal. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Josh Elser < > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> This would change the existing Committer == PMC, no? > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> That's the biggest thing I noticed scanning over the > document. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> On 2/14/14, 1:19 PM, Mike Drob wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >>> I think we should have some Bylaws, as that gives us more > > > > structure > > > > > > to > > > > > > > >>> operate under. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> I propose that we adopt the ZooKeeper bylaws, replacing all > > > > > > references > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > >>> ZK with Accumulo. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> http://zookeeper.apache.org/bylaws.html > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> What say ye? > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> Mike > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
