Agreed. Linking is better. Even just a search link would be useful: "https://github.com/search?q=accumulo";
-- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Keith Turner <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]>wrote: > >> -users >> +dev >> >> Would we be better off linking to them from the main page? >> > > Thats what I was thinking. The concept of contribs in Accumulo is not > well defined and lacks ownership AFAICT. > > >> >> For one, we don't know that Anagha wants their code moved from github into >> a repo controlled by our PMC. >> >> As a practical matter for non-committers, they'd have to start going >> through our review. Though I believe we could grant commit rights to just >> the repo their project would be in[1], I don't know that this would add >> much practical value over maintaining the code in its current location. >> >> >> [1]: http://accumulo.apache.org/contrib.html >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Arshak Navruzyan <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Garry, >> > >> > Thanks for putting this up. >> > >> > Committers, perhaps we should start vetting these (another one was the >> > node.js connector that was posted in the last few days) and posting them >> up >> > under the contrib section. I'm can spend some time to verify the >> > functionality, make sure they are adequately documented, push it to the >> > accumulo github and under the contrib section. >> > >> > Arshak >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Garry Steedman <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> > >> >> Hello all, >> >> >> >> my colleague Anagha Khanolkar has developed some useful Cascading >> >> (2.5.2) extensions for Accumulo (1.5.0). >> >> >> >> Source is available here: https://github.com/airawat/cascading.accumulo >> >> >> >> cheers, >> >> >> >> Garry >> >> >> > >> > >>
