***Punctuation: PMC section: "PMC from a Foundation perspective is" -> "PMC, from a Foundation perspective, is" "Secondly " -> "Secondly, " "long term" -> "long-term" "not coding - but to ensure" -> "not coding, but to ensure" "Within the ASF we worry" -> "Within the ASF, we worry"
VETOES section (comma): "veto - merely that" -> "veto, merely that" ***Typos: APPROVALS section (typo): "that -1 votes" -> "than -1 votes" ***Definitions: I would like to see "codebase" defined. It's used throughout, but is never clearly defined... particularly in the "Adoption of New Codebase" section of the ACTIONS section. ***Other: In the ACTIONS section, it describes reinstatement actions, but not removal actions, so it's not clear what reinstatement means. It should also be made clear that the ACTIONS section is not a comprehensive list of actions. I'm also not sure that the "Release plan" should require a vote, as this seems covered by the "Product release" situation. The other actions seem to imply a vote is required for that action. Are we saying that planning to release requires a vote? If so, I can get on board... I just don't remember that happening in the past, so this isn't so much a formalization of our existing practices, but also establishing a new one as well. And, in this case, I'm not sure it's one we need. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Bill Havanki <[email protected]> wrote: > I clarify my vote with it being the first +1 (I approve) :) > > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Mike Drob <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Was pointed out an error in the vote descriptions. They should be: >> >> [ ] +1 - "I approve of these proposed bylaws and accept them for the Apache >> Accumulo project" >> [ ] +0 - "I neither approve nor disapprove of these bylaws, but accept them >> for the Apache Accumulo project" >> [ ] -1 - "I do not approve of these proposed bylaws and do not accept them >> for the Apache Accumulo project because..." >> >> Obviously, everybody has a choice when they're voting. :) >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Mike Drob <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Please vote on the proposed bylaws, as available at >> > >> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/accumulo/site/trunk/content/bylaws.mdtext?revision=1574615&view=markup >> > >> > A nicer to read version is available at >> > http://accumulo.apache.org/bylaws.html >> > >> > This vote will be open for 7 days, until 17 March 18:15 UTC. >> > >> > Upon successful completion of this vote, the first line of the document >> > body will be replaced with "This is version 1 of the bylaws." >> Additionally, >> > and a link will be added to this document on the nav-bar on the left. >> > >> > This vote requires majority approval to pass: at least 3 +1 votes and >> more >> > +1 than -1's. >> > >> > Mike >> > >> > [ ] +1 - "I approve of these proposed bylaws and accept them for the >> > Apache Accumulo project" >> > [ ] +0 - "I neither approve nor disapprove of these bylaws, but accept >> > them for the Apache Accumulo project" >> > [ ] +1 - "I do not approve of these proposed bylaws and do not accept >> them >> > for the Apache Accumulo project because..." >> > >> > > > > -- > // Bill Havanki > // Solutions Architect, Cloudera Govt Solutions > // 443.686.9283
