I was going rewrite it to use singular they instead of the current combination of "his/her" and "his or her". But I haven't found time to do it yet.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Bill Havanki <[email protected]>wrote: > I removed the reinstatement voting actions, as discussed earlier in this > thread. The actions are now purely "New Committer" and "New PMC Member". > > I think a diff between the votes is a great idea, easy to do with svn. > > Any other feedback or issues with the proposed bylaws? > > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Mike Drob <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I think at this point, any willing person can make edits. I do not expect > > we will suffer from too many cooks. > > > > For the next vote, it would be a good idea to include a diff to the first > > vote. > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Sean Busbey <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > How are we handling proposed changes? Just post a new version? Email > > > description and then some coordinating editor (Bill H?) handles > > > implementation? > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Bill Havanki < > [email protected] > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > I think you are right about the reinstatement actions. > > > > > > > > - If a committer cannot lose status, she cannot be denied getting the > > > > commit bit back / her password reset after going idle / emeritus. So, > > no > > > > vote is warranted. > > > > - An emeritus PMC member can simply declare that she is back via > email > > > (the > > > > bylaws even say so right now). > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Christopher <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Thanks for doing this. > > > > > > > > > > I'm still not sure it makes sense to have "reinstatement" even on > the > > > > > list of voting actions, given that removal is not a possible thing, > > > > > but everything else looks good. > > > > > > > > > > I'm more comfortable with the release plan being in the initial > > > > > bylaws, now that we've discussed what that means, so I'm glad you > > > > > included that stuff. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Christopher L Tubbs II > > > > > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Bill Havanki < > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > > > > > > > I have updated our proposed bylaws to account for feedback that > > arose > > > > > from > > > > > > the first vote. Here is the link: > > > > > > > > > > > > http://accumulo.apache.org/bylaws.html > > > > > > > > > > > > The following is a summary of my updates. There was a lot of > > > > (excellent) > > > > > > discussion, so please do point out unintentional omissions, > > > > > > misinterpretations, or errors that are somewhat likely to be > there. > > > :) > > > > > > > > > > > > - Fixed punctuation errors and typos noticed by Christopher. > > > > > > - Voting action changes: > > > > > > - Noted that new actions may be added as needed to the list > > > > > > - Changed the release plan action to lazy consensus, falling > back > > > to > > > > > > majority approval) > > > > > > - Added release plan cancellation (re-plan) action, majority > > > approval > > > > > > - Clarified difference between release plan and product release > > > > actions > > > > > > - Defined "codebase" using Mike's definition > > > > > > - Noted that committer and PMC removal actions are > intentionally > > > not > > > > > > defined, with references > > > > > > - Added release manager role section > > > > > > - Added release plan section, with content definition based on > > Mike's > > > > > list > > > > > > - Noted specifically that dates in release plans are estimates > > > > > > > > > > > > I punted on laying out release guidelines, as we have a page for > > > those > > > > > [1] > > > > > > that I could defer to. > > > > > > > > > > > > I also punted on version numbering, just for now. As with other > > > > issues, I > > > > > > can certainly see that as a worthwhile later addition. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you in advance for reviewing. I'm hopeful that we can call > a > > > > second > > > > > > vote by next week. > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] http://accumulo.apache.org/governance/releasing.html > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > // Bill Havanki > > > > > > // Solutions Architect, Cloudera Govt Solutions > > > > > > // 443.686.9283 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > // Bill Havanki > > > > // Solutions Architect, Cloudera Govt Solutions > > > > // 443.686.9283 > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > // Bill Havanki > // Solutions Architect, Cloudera Govt Solutions > // 443.686.9283 >
