----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19790/#review39049 -----------------------------------------------------------
Josh, after I converted your doc to markdown I should have sent it to you and let you post it to RB. I was so excited about experimenting w/ reviewing design docs on RB that I did not really think that part through. Josh, what do you think about starting a new review on RB w/ the next iteration of the document? You could start it and all subsequent versions could go there. We can link to both on the ticket. What do people think of reviewing design docs this way so far? I really like it. Much better than mailing list or jira comments. - kturner On March 28, 2014, 5:54 p.m., kturner wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/19790/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated March 28, 2014, 5:54 p.m.) > > > Review request for accumulo. > > > Bugs: ACCUMULO-378 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-378 > > > Repository: accumulo > > > Description > ------- > > ACCUMULO-378 Design document. Posting for review here, not meant for commit. > Final version of document should be posted on issue. > > > Diffs > ----- > > docs/src/main/resources/design/ACCUMULO-378-design.mdtext PRE-CREATION > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19790/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > kturner > >
