> On April 2, 2014, 5:44 p.m., Josh Elser wrote: > > docs/src/main/resources/design/ACCUMULO-378-design.mdtext, line 62 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/19862/diff/1/?file=543190#file543190line62> > > > > Need to consider what kind of authentication/authorization is done > > before the slave will accept data from a "master". > > > > The master needs to know the slave's secret?
If we are not encrypting this communication, as stated in the "non-goals" section, then I am very uncomfortable with sending a cluster secret over the wire. - Mike ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19862/#review39304 ----------------------------------------------------------- On April 1, 2014, 1:58 a.m., Josh Elser wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/19862/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated April 1, 2014, 1:58 a.m.) > > > Review request for accumulo. > > > Bugs: ACCUMULO-378 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-378 > > > Repository: accumulo > > > Description > ------- > > Re-posting a version of the design doc that I own. Contains grammatical fixes > from round one, with a few extra clarifications. New content should be posted > here, but I'll maintain the old review as discussion progresses. > > > Diffs > ----- > > docs/src/main/resources/design/ACCUMULO-378-design.mdtext PRE-CREATION > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19862/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Josh Elser > >
