On 4/4/14, 2:09 PM, Keith Turner wrote:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Josh Elser<[email protected]> wrote:
>Granted, the syntax is probably expressive enough to read, but viewing it
>in plaintext isn't the same as having it "rendered".
>
>The lack of varying font size is probably the most noticeable problem.
>Trying to read a table in raw markdown is also a good example. Code
>snippets also are difficult to read.
>
Could post a rendered version of the doc for each version of the source
posted on RB. Could do this as an attachment on the issue or on
http://people/~committer/
Yeah, that's exactly what I was thinking. I mentioned on IRC, but if I
have more docs I want to write up for 378, I'll try this out too.