Can you give an example of where this happens?
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 10:54 AM, John Vines <[email protected]> wrote: > Given our support of backwards compatibility, does anyone have a preference > for how traces are stored? > > I ask because I have noticed some places where our internal trace hooks are > named with collisions so that you get multiple events with the same > identifier which are actually different events. I would like to change > them, ideally for 1.5.2 and 1.6.1(0?) simply because it's hampering the > ability to do performance testing and tuning. > > But I'm not sure if A. we're okay making these changes from a compatibility > perspective and B. we're okay making these changes as part of a minor > release. >
