I'm running RW with ShortClean, and I have reported a number of issues (ACCUMULO-2655). They may be issues with my test environment, or the mechanism used to tear down the tests after they timeout. I'm still investigating.
-Eric On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Keith Turner <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm running a 24hr CI run w/o agitation on hour 14. This run has patches > from ACCUMULO-2668, ACCUMULO-2667, and ACCUMULO-2670. > > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Can we circle back on where we are wrt required testing on 1.6.0? As is, >> there's < 24hr remaining on the RC1 vote. >> >> I think we have outstanding: >> >> 1) Continuous Ingest run 24 hrs w/o agitation, verified >> >> 2) RandomWalk with LongClean for 24hrs >> >> 3) RandomWalk with LongClean and agitation for 24hrs >> >> I believe Mike D. finished the 72hr CI w/o agitation and Bill H. has a #2 >> in progress. >> >> I had #1 queued for this previous weekend on BigTop 0.7.0, but my cluster >> had NIC issues under stress and blew up. It did get to do some ingestion >> and it did make attempts for hte full 24hr. so if it gets fixed in time I >> still could go through recovery and verification. >> >> Does anyone else have tests in progress that will fulfill #1 and #3? >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Bill Havanki <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> >> > I have been working randomwalk. I got through my issue with the >> Concurrent >> > rw test [1]. I am now seeing a problem with Shard [2] which I'm rerunning >> > to get more information. >> > >> > I haven't seen the particular issues Eric encountered [3]. >> > >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2621 >> > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2657 >> > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2655 >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > > I had a successful run of all UTs and ITs on Tuesday (against 479a36bd) >> > > >> > > >> > > On 4/3/14, 1:58 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: >> > > >> > >> Cloudera has finished successfully verifying a 24 hour Continuous >> Ingest >> > >> Test with agitation on an HA configured cluster with 7 nodes and 5 >> > workers >> > >> against 1.6.0 as of commit 3a1b38. >> > >> >> > >> We'd like to coordinate with anyone else who's working through the >> > release >> > >> criteria. >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > // Bill Havanki >> > // Solutions Architect, Cloudera Govt Solutions >> > // 443.686.9283 >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Sean >>
