This vote fails with 4 "-1"s, and no other votes. RC2 will be forthcoming.
-- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Eric Newton <[email protected]> wrote: > -1 > > Testing is going pretty well. I'm looking forward to RC2. :-) > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Christopher <[email protected]> wrote: > >> -1 >> >> Though I started the vote, I'm also going to -1 for the performance >> issue, since we have a ready fix. >> >> -- >> Christopher L Tubbs II >> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 1:14 AM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: >> > -1 due to the large performance regression (~40% degradation) identified >> by >> > Jonathan Park in ACCUMULO-2668 >> > >> > Additionally, it would be nice to get ACCUMULO-2665 to ensure that we can >> > unit test against Apache Hadoop 2.4.0 for 1.6.0, but I am not -1 on that >> > issue alone (just -0 if it comes to that). >> > >> > Aside from those two, the rest of the release looks pretty good to me: >> > >> > * Used 86a9a8a1 to run unit and integration tests against Apache Hadoop >> > 2.2.0, 2.3.0, and 2.4.0 (with ACCUMULO-2665 caveat for 2.4.0) >> > * Verified sigs and hashes for tarballs (didn't write a script to verify >> all >> > sigs from the staging repo -- I trust nexus here) >> > * Ran short CI+verification on Apache Hadoop 2.3.0 >> > * Ran short CI on Apache Hadoop 2.4.0 (ran into an issue with launching >> the >> > verification job -- maybe it's just me doing something dumb?) >> > * Verified basic compatibility with Apache Pig 0.13.0-SNAPSHOT (caveat >> > PIG-3885). Read/Write data, join two tables. >> > * Downloaded source tarball, built jars and nativemaps, ran unit and >> > integration tests, and tested basic read/write test on Apache Hadoop >> 2.3.0 >> > * Downloaded binary tarball, built nativemaps, tested basic read/write on >> > Apache Hadoop 2.3.0 >> > >> > One final (repeated) comment, the binary tarball lack of a prebuilt >> native >> > map. I believe this merits mention in the release notes before those are >> > finalized. I will update this. >> > >> > >> > On 4/11/14, 6:41 PM, Christopher wrote: >> >> >> >> Accumulo Developers, >> >> >> >> Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.6.0. >> >> >> >> Git Commit: 86a9a8a1d4f5215039ad2cfe86b0b7397455838a >> >> Branch: 1.6.0-RC1 >> >> >> >> Staging repo: >> >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1007 >> >> Source: >> >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1007/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-src.tar.gz >> >> Binary: >> >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1007/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-bin.tar.gz >> >> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a >> >> given artifact.) >> >> >> >> All artifacts were built and staged with: >> >> mvn release:prepare && mvn release:perform >> >> >> >> Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS >> >> >> >> Release notes (in progress): >> >> http://accumulo.apache.org/release_notes/1.6.0 >> >> >> >> This vote will remain open for 96 hours (4 days, due to the weekend, >> >> and because I know some people want to finish some long tests), until >> >> Tue, April 15, 23:00 UTC 2014. (That's 7pm EDT.) >> >> >> >> [ ] +1 - I have verified and accept... >> >> [ ] +0 - I have reservations, but not strong enough to vote against... >> >> [ ] -1 - Because..., I do not accept... >> >> ... these artifacts as the 1.6.0 release of Apache Accumulo. >> >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> >> P.S. Hint: download the whole staging repo with >> >> wget -erobots=off -r -l inf -np -nH >> >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1007/ >> >> # note the trailing slash is needed >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Christopher L Tubbs II >> >> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >> >> >> > >>
