Some of these tickets still look like very valid feature/integration requests that would still be reasonable to have.
See ACCUMULO-74, ACCUMULO-143, ACCUMULO-136, ACCUMULO-211, ACCUMULO-483, ACCUMULO-490, ACCUMULO-508 On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com> wrote: > Deleting tickets is a no-no, but flagging them is certainly fine. > On Apr 19, 2014 12:03 AM, "David Medinets" <david.medin...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Opps. Sorry, I did my filtering badly. There are 68 tickets over 2 years > > old. > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-18?jql=project%20%3D%20ACCUMULO%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22%29%20AND%20created%20%3C%3D%20-104w%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20ASC > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:01 AM, David Medinets > > <david.medin...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-551?jql=project%20%3D%20ACCUMULO%20AND%20created%20%3C%3D%20-104w%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20DESC > > > > > > Is there a technique we can use to curate old tickets? Would anyone > mind > > > if I review them and nominate tickets for closure? I can add a message > > and > > > delete any tickets that don't provoke a response. How useful are > tickets > > > that are two years old? > > > > > >
