There's possibly more ZK usage with more tables, and more user/security overhead with more tables, but I can't imagine that's a limiting factor.
-- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Mike Drob <[email protected]> wrote: > I think the limitation in Accumulo is on Tablets, not Tables (module > cluster size, of course). > > I've never seen anything that would indicate number of tables on a system > to be an issue. > > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 3:21 PM, David Medinets > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I have never used HBase and I've only used Accumulo with less than 100 >> tables. However, when I see a statement like the following about HBase, I >> feel compelled to ask how it compares to Accumulo. Does anyone know? >> >> http://phoenix.incubator.apache.org/views.html: >> This is especially important in HBase, as you cannot >> realistically expect to have more than perhaps up >> to a hundred physical tables and continue to get >> reasonable performance from HBase. >>
