-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21103/#review42303
-----------------------------------------------------------


-1 This is expected behavior. A build plugin configuration always overrides a 
pluginManagement configuration. The excludes are explicitly defined in the 
pluginManagement section so that it does inherit from the parent, rather than 
the parent override the child. Further, unless we override it in the 
pluginManagement section, we want to inherit from whatever configuration is 
defined in the Apache parent POM, if any, rather than override it. The proper 
way to exlude something at the top level would be to add a configuration 
section to that top-level pluginManagement section, not to add excludes to the 
build/plugins/plugin section that declares the execution.

- Christopher Tubbs


On May 6, 2014, 3:25 a.m., Sean Busbey wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/21103/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 6, 2014, 3:25 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for accumulo and Christopher Tubbs.
> 
> 
> Bugs: ACCUMULO-2775
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2775
> 
> 
> Repository: accumulo
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> For those modules that have plugin configurations specific to their runs, set 
> the configurations in build/plugins/plugin so that the configuration takes 
> precedence over default configurations set in parent poms.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   core/pom.xml 39de12a 
>   examples/simple/pom.xml 2b6ab69 
>   server/pom.xml bd61fe6 
>   start/pom.xml 5fc9346 
>   test/pom.xml ad60054 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/21103/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Verified that mvn org.apache.rat:apache-rat-plugin:check passed before and 
> after change on clean checkout.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sean Busbey
> 
>

Reply via email to