> On May 16, 2014, 8:19 p.m., Josh Elser wrote:
> > server/tserver/src/test/java/org/apache/accumulo/tserver/log/LocalWALRecoveryTest.java,
> >  line 75
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/21567/diff/1/?file=583640#file583640line75>
> >
> >     Wouldn't it have simplified things to just use the RawLocalFileSystem 
> > over the ChecksumFileSystem? I'm not sure if there are any drawbacks to 
> > using the RawLocalFileSystem off the top of my head.
> 
> Sean Busbey wrote:
>     Maybe?
>     
>     I don't see an obvious place where we're choosing one or the other. If 
> hte ChecksumFileSystem is the default when giving a Hadoop configuration that 
> doesn't use HDFS, I'd rather stay at defaults. That way if we want later we 
> can inject different configurations to do minidfs or an actual cluster or 
> whatever.

Hadoop defaults to the ChecksumFileSystem for the fs.file.impl (or whatever the 
non-deprecated property is these days). Because we're not writing, it's 
probably not a big deal (the notable difference I'm aware of is that 
ChecksumFileSystem doesn't implement flush/sync semantics properly). I'm not 
sure what the old loggers did in 1.4 -- you or Mike probably know better than I 
do (did they even use the Hadoop FileSystem API?).

I'm not sure I understand what you meant about injecting configurations to 
minidfs because this is purely for reading data off of local filesystem.


- Josh


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21567/#review43255
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 16, 2014, 7:42 p.m., Sean Busbey wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/21567/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 16, 2014, 7:42 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for accumulo, Josh Elser and Mike Drob.
> 
> 
> Bugs: ACCUMULO-2816
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2816
> 
> 
> Repository: accumulo
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
>     ACCUMULO-2816 Ensure LocalWALRecovery looks at WAL.
>     
>     * consolidated filtering of crc so that underlying fs return order on 
> directory contents doesn't matter
>     * added better error message for reading an invalid wal
>     * fixed v2 vs v3 magic header reading
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   server/tserver/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/tserver/log/DfsLogger.java 
> eb04f09021f313c2c12ad15f2ae443c368452418 
>   
> server/tserver/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/tserver/logger/LogFileKey.java
>  1e33569af680079b72dde6e57833b096f5310129 
>   
> server/tserver/src/test/java/org/apache/accumulo/tserver/log/LocalWALRecoveryTest.java
>  99190b2a3ae6773f70ce4b5508f1b3dab19cfd3e 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/21567/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> unit tests pass (they did not on my system prior to this patch)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sean Busbey
> 
>

Reply via email to