I like labels to identify testing needs, as well as which tests were performed. "needs-test", followed by "tested-24hr-ci", etc.
-- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote: > There's a label "needs-test" that we don't already use for anything. We > could use this to mean "needs more than bugfix level testing." > > I started looking at what it takes to add a field, but it's not obvious at > first glance. If we figure it out, we could add a "test level" field that > says "bugfix", "minor", "major" to indicate how much testing we need. Even > if we currently don't define all three levels, where ever we explain the > use of the field we could conflate as we desire. > > > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: > > > What did you have in mind? Please make a suggestion. > > > > > > On 6/27/14, 2:28 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: > > > >> as a follow up, can we agree on a label or add a flag to jiras that can > be > >> used to signal when we think a particular issue introduces changes that > >> warrant the higher level of testing scrutiny? > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> I just pushed this to production. Thanks to those who gave their > >>> opinions. > >>> > >>> > >>> On 6/26/14, 2:59 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > >>> > >>> I've update the language on the release guidelines on the staged > site[1] > >>>> for what was discussed here. > >>>> > >>>> Please let me know if there are any problems with it, otherwise I'll > >>>> push the changes to production later today. If you miss this message > >>>> before I push to production, please feel free to continue the > discussion > >>>> and we can revise the language and make sure we're all happy. > >>>> > >>>> - Josh > >>>> > >>>> [1] http://accumulo.staging.apache.org/governance/ > >>>> releasing.html#testing > >>>> > >>>> On 6/19/14, 3:40 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On 6/19/14, 12:36 PM, Keith Turner wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> I am in favor of lowering the required threshhold. If someone feels > >>>>>> not > >>>>>> enough testing was done, they can vote -1 the release vote. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> I like that. If there is a specific area/reason to be concerned, it > can > >>>>> be addressed as a part of the regular release voting process. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > > > -- > Sean >
