> On July 15, 2014, 6:57 p.m., Mike Drob wrote:
> > core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/iterators/IteratorUtil.java, 
> > lines 63-75
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/23517/diff/1/?file=632700#file632700line63>
> >
> >     Should this just be an EnumMap that we populate at start-up?

I had placed these in a static-final Map, initialized in a static block, but it 
appeared that the Property values were not being initialized and ended up being 
null when I accessed the Map. Wasn't really sure what was going on, tbh, but 
for 3 elements in the enum (that have no sign of changing), I didn't find this 
to be too smelly.


- Josh


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23517/#review47794
-----------------------------------------------------------


On July 15, 2014, 6:51 p.m., Josh Elser wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/23517/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 15, 2014, 6:51 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for accumulo.
> 
> 
> Bugs: ACCUMULO-2994
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2994
> 
> 
> Repository: accumulo
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Limits the scope of configuration elements read to only those 
> iterator-relevant keys that are for the given scope. Reduces unnecessary 
> processing in creating iterators.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/conf/Property.java d8f9beb 
>   core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/iterators/IteratorUtil.java 
> 1d58c2f 
>   core/src/test/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/iterators/IterUtilTest.java 
> e569ea4 
>   core/src/test/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/iterators/IteratorUtilTest.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23517/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Unit tests for 1.5. Will merge up to 1.6 to run the ITs as well.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Josh Elser
> 
>

Reply via email to