> On Aug. 19, 2014, 6:21 p.m., Josh Elser wrote: > > docs/src/main/asciidoc/design/ACCUMULO-1454-proposal-01.adoc, line 105 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/24855/diff/1/?file=664453#file664453line105> > > > > If you're providing an unloadTablets method, I would think calling > > loadTablets on a tablet that is already loaded should throw an Exception, > > not unload it for you. > > kturner wrote: > My thinking was that load tablets would load on the specified tserver, > irrespective of the tablets current status. > > Josh Elser wrote: > That means that you would be in favor of an already loaded tablet on > another tserver unloading itself first (which means its essentially a move)? > Or are you implying that the requested load of an already assigned tablet > would implicitly fail because that operation is impossible?
For the case where its loaded on another tserver, I was thinking unload and then load. - kturner ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24855/#review50998 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Aug. 19, 2014, 5:50 p.m., kturner wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/24855/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Aug. 19, 2014, 5:50 p.m.) > > > Review request for accumulo. > > > Bugs: ACCUMULO-1454 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1454 > > > Repository: accumulo > > > Description > ------- > > Positing ACCUMULO-1454 design doc for review > > > Diffs > ----- > > docs/src/main/asciidoc/design/ACCUMULO-1454-proposal-01.adoc PRE-CREATION > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24855/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > kturner > >
