Github user keith-turner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/16#discussion_r18089531
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/client/admin/TableOperations.java
---
@@ -103,6 +103,25 @@
void create(String tableName, boolean versioningIter, TimeType timeType)
throws AccumuloException, AccumuloSecurityException, TableExistsException;
/**
+ * @param tableName
+ * the name of the table
+ * @param limitVersion
+ * Enables/disables the versioning iterator, which will limit
the number of Key versions kept.
+ * @param timeType
+ * specifies logical or real-time based time recording for
entries in the table
+ * @param properties
+ * initial table properties the user wants
+ * @throws AccumuloException
+ * if a general error occurs
+ * @throws AccumuloSecurityException
+ * if the user does not have permission
+ * @throws TableExistsException
+ * if the table already exists
+ */
+ void create(String tableName, boolean limitVersion, TimeType timeType,
Map<String,String> properties) throws AccumuloException,
AccumuloSecurityException,
--- End diff --
Could split this work into two branches. One branch for adding tables
props to create table and another for this issue, and then rebase this branch
on the other. I am thinking of working on ACCUMULO-1798 and ACCUMULO-3134 in
two branches concurrently, with ACCUMULO-3134 branch being based on
ACCUMULO-1798 branch. Was thinking this would make things easier for reviewers
when I submit them for review, but I have never tried this before so uncertain
of benefit.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
