Okay.
-- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: > Ya -- I've been holding this in my back pocket. > > I'll open up an issue on JIRA later today if we don't already have one. > > Sean Busbey wrote: > >> I think a little over a week is a fair window and AFAICT we have lazy >> consensus to drop it. >> >> -Sean >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Christopher <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Did we make a decision on this? >> >> >> -- >> Christopher L Tubbs II >> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >> >> On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Christopher <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> > On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 8:21 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> > >> >> Have we already decided to drop Hadoop 1 for 1.7.0? I can't >> remember >> >> anymore. >> >> >> >> If we haven't decided to do so already, I'd like to suggest >> doing so. >> >> >> >> - Josh >> >> >> > >> > I thought we had discussed this for 2.0.0, but that was when we >> thought we >> > might release a 2.0 instead of a 1.7. I'm okay with doing it in >> 1.7, but >> > with some minor reservations. Doing this will mean that the last >> supported >> > Accumulo line for Hadoop 1 users is 1.6.x. This will mean that if >> we want >> > to support users on Hadoop 1, we'll have to maintain the 1.6.x >> branch >> > longer, vs. maintaining support with 1.x (1.7, maybe 1.8, etc.) >> > >> > So, doing this will involve a choice in the future: continue >> maintaining >> > 1.6 for perhaps longer than we might have otherwise done, or >> leave those >> > users in the dust (if there are any). >> > >> > -- >> > Christopher L Tubbs II >> > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >> > >> > >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Sean >> >
