On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote:
> This vote fails, with: > > -1: Mike, Sean, John > +1: Christopher, Keith > > Even without my implicit +1, or Bill and Josh's late -1's, the vote still > fails. > > I think it would help if each person voting -1 (for reasons other than the > fact that there is disagreement or the thread was confusing or difficult to > follow), would please reply with a very short and concise summary of what > guidelines they think we *should* adopt. > The compromise proposed by Josh that works for me is the original with the addition of * No client RPC removals or change in behavior of extant calls prior to 2.0 (non-inclusive or inclusive doesn't matter to me) * Documenting the above in release notes for 1.x by way of tests that clients compiled with 1.6 work when talking to a cluster running the newer release -- Sean
