If it goes to notifications@ that is inherently a noisy list and I'm not worried about Josh taking a week off and a nightly build failing and sending an email.
Christopher, would a set of keys held in escrow cover your concerns? Josh, thanks for doing this and keeping it running on your own dime. A real mensch! On Mar 13, 2015 2:43 PM, "Christopher" <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not suggesting to impose external control. I just think it'd be > nice to know that, if the worst were to happen, and the service > started behaving badly while you were on vacation, we'd have some > recourse to control the automated notices to the email lists. > > [ If you do get hit by a truck, I *will* call you out on it ;) ] > > -- > Christopher L Tubbs II > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: > > If I wasn't clear the first time, anyone can view the results right now. > > > > I'm still not sure why you feel the need to impose external control over > a > > system that I'm paying for and offering to provide as a service to the > > project. Unless I get hit by a truck, it's not like I won't be > responsive -- > > and if I do rescind on that promise, you are more than welcome to call me > > out on it. Being unresponsive is one criticism that I don't think I've > been > > given WRT Accumulo. > > > > IMO, the real question here is are people going to be looking at these > > results and doing anything with them? If they're just going to /dev/null, > > it's not worth it to me and I'll just do triage/fixing as I find time. > > > > > > Christopher wrote: > >> > >> Looks fine in Chrome to me (but my Chrome is using my shared NSS > >> certificate store for my system). > >> > >> I can't think of anything immediately to configure... just speculating > >> that it might add utility when needed. At the very least, I would want > >> more than one person with the ability to turn off / modify the email > >> to the mailing list, if necessary. > >> > >> Being able to view the results without configuration permissions would > >> still be added value on its own, though. > >> > >> -- > >> Christopher L Tubbs II > >> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Josh Elser<[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Maybe this will help too. Last night's builds: > >>> > >>> > >>> > https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-1.6-Integration-Tests/325/ > >>> > >>> > >>> > https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-Master-Integration-Tests/272/ > >>> > >>> If you use Chrome, I don't think they accept StartCom SSL certs as > >>> trusted > >>> (so you'll get the crazy-scary red warning page), but it should be > >>> trusted > >>> by default in FF. > >>> > >>> > >>> Josh Elser wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Presently, you can see the full workspace for the last job that was > run. > >>>> > >>>> I'd have to look into Jenkins permissions, but what exactly do you > think > >>>> you would need to configure? > >>>> > >>>> Christopher wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> That might only be valuable if we could log on to it to view the test > >>>>> results and/or configure the jobs. > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II > >>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Josh Elser<[email protected]> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> For those who don't know, I run a Jenkins instance on a VPS I own. > >>>>>> I've been > >>>>>> running ITs for 1.6 and master nightly for some time now and it's > been > >>>>>> really nice to get these results. It has just enough resources to > run > >>>>>> through them reliably (some of the really heavy-handed tests fail on > >>>>>> it), > >>>>>> but personally it feels like a good baseline for ensuring the tests > >>>>>> are > >>>>>> runnable by anyone. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> If others feel like they might get value from it, I can set up > emails > >>>>>> to be > >>>>>> sent to the [email protected] list instead of just > to > >>>>>> myself. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thoughts/Opinions? >
