Okay, I got behind, but I'm going to put together an RC2 for 1.6.3 today. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Christopher <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks. I missed your explicit -1. > > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015, 11:37 Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> For archival correctness, there were two -1's >> >> Christopher wrote: >> > This vote fails with one +1 and one -1. I'll prepare an RC2 with the >> > fix for the issue Josh identified included, as well as whatever other >> > fixes have been applied to the 1.6 branch. >> > >> > -- >> > Christopher L Tubbs II >> > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Josh Elser<[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> Josh Elser wrote: >> >>> This did work correctly for 1.6.2, so I think this is -1 from me on >> >>> this release. I will file an issue shortly. >> >>> >> >>> Otherwise, things were looking good. >> >>> >> >>> * Verified sigs/xsums >> >>> * Ingested 6B entries with CI (still need to verify) >> >> >> >> Verify came back successful >> >> >> >> >> >>> * All unit and integration tests passed >> >>> (TracerRecoversAfterOfflineTableIT failed on the first IT attempt, but >> >>> I do feel confident that the intended span was just dropped, not that >> >>> the Tracer didn't recover which was the intent of the test). >> >>>
