Github user tristeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/74#issuecomment-189065742
Added in IT tests for the new functions, but ran into an interesting error
and am hoping you all can provide me with some insight. I've added the
following test into TestProxyNamespaceOperations:
```
@Ignore("namespaceIdMap() is returning unexpected results; Python client
works as expected. Investigating")
@Test
public void namespaceIds() throws TException {
assertTrue(tpc.proxy().namespaceIdMap(userpass).containsKey("accumulo"));
assertEquals(tpc.proxy().namespaceIdMap(userpass).get("accumulo"),
"+accumulo");
}
```
You can see I've ignored it...when I run through the debugger,
`tpc.proxy().namespaceIdMap(userpass)` returns a map that seems to list the
accumulo namespace tables (unexpected):
```
"accumulo.replication" -> "accumulo.replication"
"accumulo.metadata" -> "accumulo.metadata"
"accumulo.root" -> "accumulo.root"
```
When I run this same function through the Python test client and print the
map, I get this Python map (which is what I expect for this function):
`{'': '+default', 'testing': '1', 'accumulo': '+accumulo'}`
As far as I can tell, I haven't messed up the function in the
ProxyServer.java file:
```
@Override
public Map<String,String> namespaceIdMap(ByteBuffer login) throws
org.apache.accumulo.proxy.thrift.AccumuloException,
org.apache.accumulo.proxy.thrift.AccumuloSecurityException,
TException {
try {
return getConnector(login).namespaceOperations().namespaceIdMap();
} catch (Exception e) {
handleException(e);
return null;
}
}
```
Any thoughts on where I should look?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
