Github user ShawnWalker commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/94#discussion_r59887691
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/client/impl/TabletServerBatchWriter.java
---
@@ -733,7 +733,7 @@ else if (Tables.getTableState(context.getInstance(),
table) == TableState.OFFLIN
void queueMutations(final MutationSet mutationsToSend) throws
InterruptedException {
if (null == mutationsToSend)
return;
- binningThreadPool.execute(new Runnable() {
+ binningThreadPool.execute(Trace.wrap(new Runnable() {
--- End diff --
Looking at `org.apache.htrace.wrappers.TraceRunnable`, it's not really
designed to be used as you're suggesting. One would hope to be able to write:
```java
threadPool.execute(new TraceRunnable() { ... })
```
But the best that `TraceRunnable` allows is:
```java
threadPool.execute(new TraceRunnable(new Runnable() {...}));
```
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
