Re: Snappy as default table.file.compress.type?

[Josh Elser]

Uhh, besides what I already mentioned? (close in compressed size but 
"much" faster)

Christopher wrote:
What's the motivation for changing it?
On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 10:47 PM Josh Elser<josh.el...@gmail.com>  wrote:

Any reason we don't want to do this? Last rule-of-thumb I heard was that
snappy is often close enough in compression to GZ but quite a bit faster
(I don't remember exactly how much).

- Josh