The change to add the instance number to the .out and .err files should be 
pretty simple. I'll take a look at it. Regarding the change if there is only 
one tserver, I'm not sure how you would specify the conditional in the logging 
configuration file. 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Josh Elser" <[email protected]> 
To: "dev" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 12:20:39 PM 
Subject: Change in out-of-the-box log file naming after ACCUMULO-4328 

I noticed that the default log file names for Accumulo services has 
changed (I'm assuming after ACCUMULO-4328) 

[accumulo@jelser-accumulo-180-2 accumulo-1.8.0]$ ll logs/ 
total 188700 
-rw-rw-r--. 1 accumulo accumulo 17887094 Aug 15 16:13 
gc_1_jelser-accumulo-180-2.openstacklocal.debug.log 
-rw-rw-r--. 1 accumulo accumulo 11183781 Aug 15 16:12 
gc_1_jelser-accumulo-180-2.openstacklocal.log 
-rw-rw-r--. 1 accumulo accumulo 0 Aug 14 02:50 
gc_jelser-accumulo-180-2.openstacklocal.err.1 
-rw-rw-r--. 1 accumulo accumulo 0 Aug 14 02:50 
gc_jelser-accumulo-180-2.openstacklocal.out.1 
-rw-rw-r--. 1 accumulo accumulo 0 Aug 14 01:20 
jelser-accumulo-180-2.openstacklocal.audit 
-rw-rw-r--. 1 accumulo accumulo 158246309 Aug 15 16:13 
master_1_jelser-accumulo-180-2.openstacklocal.debug.log 
-rw-rw-r--. 1 accumulo accumulo 2157925 Aug 15 16:13 
master_1_jelser-accumulo-180-2.openstacklocal.log 
-rw-rw-r--. 1 accumulo accumulo 0 Aug 15 16:13 
master_jelser-accumulo-180-2.openstacklocal.err 
-rw-rw-r--. 1 accumulo accumulo 0 Aug 15 16:13 
master_jelser-accumulo-180-2.openstacklocal.out 

(note the extra "_1") 

IMO, this is an unnecessary change (if I only run one tserver, why are 
the log file names different?), but I'm not presently of the opinion 
that this is a blocker. I just noticed this because of the two different 
file-naming schemes in this directory. I wanted to make sure it was 
mentioned in case someone had a clear case why this may break downstream 
(e.g. another system that would require changes to parse these log names). 

Now that I think about it some more, I'm not sure why I don't have 
"_1"'s included in the .out/.err files too. Maybe that is a bug? Is that 
something you recall testing, Dave? 

- Josh 

Reply via email to