Uhh, woah. That's a rather big discrepancy. Yes, the number of referenced+unreferenced should be equal to the number of entries in the table (exactly, IIRC).

Michael Wall wrote:
The accumulo monitor showed 22.86 B entries in the ci table.  Should that
match the verify output?

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Josh Elser<josh.el...@gmail.com>  wrote:

I didn't time it closely, but ingest ran for about 24hrs.

3B entries seems low for 8nodes, but I'm sure it's fine. I also had to
knock back the hdfs replication for the ci table from 3 to 2 after about 12
hrs because I was running out of space. That probably also helped my run go
faster :)


Michael Wall wrote:

Cool, thanks Josh.  How long did you run?  I ran 24 hours with 11 nodes (8
tservers) on EC2 without agitation and got

                  REFERENCED=3118473398
                  UNREFERENCED=8002310

I started again with agitation last night and will check tonight.


On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Josh Elser<els...@apache.org>   wrote:

My verification on 5tservers with CI just finished successfully without
agitation:

          org.apache.accumulo.test.continuous.ContinuousVerify$Counts
                  REFERENCED=7788662607
                  UNREFERENCED=2000310

I will be starting a run with agitation now.


Josh Elser wrote:

I retract my -1 (but not yet voting +1 though). It seems like when fixed
ports are used and the tserver comes back online, the master will resume
balancing. Not a blocker then.

Josh Elser wrote:

-1 due to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4410. This
appears to be a regression to me. It would stink for OPs as there is no
way to gracefully stop a TabletServer without also having to restart
the
Master each time.

I still need to go through the rest of the diligence on rc2 (for
licensing stuff) as well as complete the verify.

Michael Wall wrote:

Accumulo Developers,
Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.8.0.

Git Commit:
e5694cfa5ec3861e6f8f764e2b8477716e3072b9
Branch:
1.8.0-rc2

If this vote passes, a gpg-signed tag will be created using:
git tag -f -m 'Apache Accumulo 1.8.0' -s rel/1.8.0
e5694cfa5ec3861e6f8f764e2b8477716e3072b9

Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
accumulo-1055

Source (official release artifact):
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
accumulo-1055/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.8.0/
accumulo-1.8.0-src.tar.gz


Binary:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
accumulo-1055/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.8.0/
accumulo-1.8.0-bin.tar.gz


(Append ".sha1", ".md5", or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for
a
given artifact.)

All artifacts were built and staged with:
mvn release:prepare&&   mvn release:perform

Signing keys are available at https://www.apache.org/dist/ac
cumulo/KEYS
(Expected fingerprint: 3E38C02F85303BAB37EE58C2F899DBF0B8C3D406)

Release notes (in progress) can be found at:
https://accumulo.apache.org/release_notes/1.8.0

Please vote one of:
[ ] +1 - I have verified and accept...
[ ] +0 - I have reservations, but not strong enough to vote against...
[ ] -1 - Because..., I do not accept...
... these artifacts as the 1.8.0 release of Apache Accumulo.

This vote will end on Fri Aug 19 16:30:00 UTC 2016
(Fri Aug 19 12:30:00 EDT 2016 / Fri Aug 19 09:30:00 PDT 2016)

Thanks!

P.S. Hint: download the whole staging repo with
wget -erobots=off -r -l inf -np -nH \

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
accumulo-1055/


# note the trailing slash is needed




Reply via email to