That's fine with me. I think people might expect a bigger jump with a major version change like that, but it's not a big deal. The good stuffs I was hoping to get into a 2.0 will just happen at 3.0 instead.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:28 PM Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote: > Why don't we just make the 1.8 branch 2.0 then? I really don't want to > drop support for JDKs on non-major releases; it's super disruptive. > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Christopher <[email protected]> wrote: > > I know we've talked about this before, but I kind of want to just use > Java > > 8 for Accumulo 1.8. It'd help clean up some things in the build (can make > > use of newer versions of build plugins, and make it easier for new > > development against the latest release). > > > > I just don't know how reasonable it is to keep making new, non-bugfix > > releases on EOL JDKs (even though I may have previously argued that it'd > be > > safer to just wait until a major version bump). > > > > -- > busbey >
