Github user keith-turner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/176#discussion_r85752895
--- Diff: _posts/blog/2016-10-28-durability-performance.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+---
+title: "Durability Performance Implications"
+date: 2016-10-28 17:00:00 +0000
+author: Keith Turner
--- End diff --
I was thinking it would be nice to add another optional field: `reviewers`.
For Fluo we decided not have an author field because the post were a
community effort. As is the case here, review always made the post so much
better. I am thinking a different way to solve this than Fluo did is to add a
reviewer field. Unless someone objects, I can add handling for that in the
template in this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
