If there's a risk, I'd suggest calling things out as "experimental" in the release notes, and encourage users to try it and give us feedback.
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 5:10 PM Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org> wrote: > hi folks! > > While reviewing things in prep for getting our master branch over to > apache hadoop 3 only (see related discussion [1]), I noticed some wording > on the last RC[2] for Hadoop 3.0.1: > > > Please note: > > * HDFS-12990. Change default NameNode RPC port back to 8020. It makes > > incompatible changes to Hadoop 3.0.0. After 3.0.1 releases, Apache > > Hadoop 3.0.0 will be deprecated due to this change. > > Hadoop 3.0.0 was a production-ready release; the community did an extended > set of alpha/beta releases to shake out the kinds of things that would have > required labeling the X.Y.0 release as non-production in previous Hadoop 2 > release lines. Deprecating it is a pretty strong signal, but from the > extended discussion[3] it seems to me that this isn't meant indicate that > the entire 3.0 release line will stop. > > What do folks think? > > - No problem from our perspective? > - Worth waiting to ship a Hadoop 3 ready release until Hadoop 3.0.1 comes > out? > - Worth waiting to ship a Hadoop 3 ready release until Hadoop 3.1.0 comes > out? > - Leave things as-is and give a word of warning for would-be early > adopters in our release notes? > - Expressly call things out in our release notes as "experimental" and we > might make changes once later Hadoop 3s come out? > > [1]: https://s.apache.org/pOKv > [2]: https://s.apache.org/brE4 > [3]: https://s.apache.org/BWd6 >