thanks for posting this Ed!

On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 2:20 AM, Ed Coleman <[email protected]> wrote:
> I thought this may be of general interest to some - I'm not implying that
> Accumulo has a specific issue, or that an action is required.
>
>
>
> On June 25th, the morning paper highlighted a study of open source licensing
> (https://blog.acolyer.org/2018/06/25/to-distribute-or-not-to-distribute-why-
> licensing-bugs-matter/)
>
>
>
> The paper abstract:
>
>
>
> Software licenses dictate how source code or binaries can be modified,
> reused, and redistributed. In the case of open source projects, software
> licenses generally fit into two main categories, permissive and restrictive,
> depending on the degree to which they allow redistribution or modification
> under licenses different from the original one(s). Developers and
> organizations can also modify existing licenses, creating custom licenses
> with specific permissive/restrictive terms. Having such a variety of
> software licenses can create confusion among software developers, and can
> easily result in the introduction of licensing bugs, not necessarily limited
> to well-known license incompatibilities. In this work, we report a study
> aimed at characterizing licensing bugs by (i) building a catalog
> categorizing the types of licensing bugs developers and other stakeholders
> face, and (ii) understanding the implications licensing bugs have on the
> software projects they affect. The presented study is the result of the
> manual analysis of 1,200 discussions related to licensing bugs carried out
> in issue trackers and in five legal mailing lists of open source
> communities. Our findings uncover new types of licensing bugs not addressed
> in prior literature, and a detailed assessment of their implications.
>
>
>
> The paper is available at:
> http://www.christophervendome.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/ICSE18-Licensin
> gBugsCRC.pdf
>
>
>
> Ed Coleman
>



-- 
busbey

Reply via email to