If I am reading semver correctly 
(https://semver.org/#what-should-i-do-if-i-update-my-own-dependencies-without-changing-the-public-api)
 this proposal has no changes to the Accumulo public API, it is an update to 
our dependencies - and would not require a major version change.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sean Busbey [mailto:bus...@cloudera.com.INVALID] 
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2019 3:52 AM
To: dev@accumulo apache. org <dev@accumulo.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Proposal to release version 1.10

-1 no dropping supported java versions in a minor release. if we want folks to 
move to java 8 then we should make it easier to upgrade to Accumulo 2.y

On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 7:37 PM Ed Coleman <edcole...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> As suggested in the LTS discussion ([LAZY][VOTE] A basic, but 
> concrete, LTS proposal), I'm breaking this out to as a separate thread 
> to keep the topic distinct.
>
>
> The proposal - I would like to start the formal release process for a 
> 1.10 version that would change the java language level to java 8.  The 
> release would be based on the current 1.9 branch and would be released 
> instead of a 1.9.4.  The 1.10 release would not contain additional 
> feature changes that are not present in the current 1.9 branch. 
> Currently, this would be based on the commit SHA:
>
>
> 328ffa0849981e0f113dfbf539c832b447e06902 - committed Thu Oct 10.
>
>
> (I am unaware of any bug-fixes or issues in the pipe line that would / 
> should be included - but hopefully this makes the intention clear.)
>
>
> The goal is to provide a candidate for LTS nomination that is based on 
> the current 1.9.x code, but unifies our currently supported branches 
> to all use java 8 as the supported language level. While this had been 
> discussed in the past, enough time has passed that a java 8 
> requirement now, seems to me, to be unlikely to impact any customers 
> that would look to upgrade Accumulo past a 1.9.3 version and have them not 
> running at least java 8.
> Having our code base with a modern, unified java language support 
> level would greatly benefit our development and reduce the burden to 
> support our multiple branches.
>
>
> This vote will be held open for at least the standard 72 hours.



--
busbey

Reply via email to