Just now following this. Looking at dockerhub, many project do something like accumulo:1.9.3, accumulo:2.0.0 and then have a tag accumulo:latest that is the latest version. So if you run `docker pull accumulo`, it uses latest by default. I have always found this a little lacking because if you need to update the Dockerfile for say accumulo:1.9.3, you must overwrite the previous images. If someone used that prior image as a base image, it is then really hard to recreate their image from scratch if they clear out their docker cache.
Numbers are free, so another option is to do something thing like accumulo-1.9.3:1, accumulo-2.0.0:4 and tag accumulo-2.0.0:latest with the last version of accumulo-2.0.0. This is what I tend to do. If we wanted to provide images running on different OS's, we might also consider names like accumulo-1.9.3-centos7:1 and accumulo-2.0.0-ubuntu16:2. Not sure that is necessary. Mike On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 9:03 AM Vincent Russell <[email protected]> wrote: > Most projects, that I've seen anyway, keep their Dockerfile in the same > repository as their source code so that it's versioned with the software > that its loading. > > Please consider doing this for accumulo. > > Thanks, > Vincent > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 8:05 AM karthick rn <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi Christopher, > > > > > Before we vote, I'd like to us to have some idea of how we will label > > > versions of accumulo-docker releases. Any opinions? > > Could we label the 'accumulo-docker' versions based on the Accumulo > version > > used in it? I thought it would be simple by just relying on Accumulo > > version & not having to maintain a separate versioning for > > 'accumulo-docker'. However, I'm not sure if this would be an acceptable > > practice in Apache, others might chime if they have any ideas? > > > > Found this JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17518, that > > suggests 2 options for publishing images to dockerhub, the 2nd option > looks > > more apt for our case & like you mentioned, we'll have to engage INFRA & > > start a discussion on "[email protected]". > > > > Thanks, > > Karthick > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 13:49, Ed Coleman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Does the NiFi community have an established process or procedure that > > they > > > follow that we could copy as a guide? ( > > > https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/nifi/) > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Christopher [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2020 12:23 AM > > > To: accumulo-dev <[email protected]> > > > Subject: Re: accumulo-docker > > > > > > First, I don't know much about how Docker or Dockerhub works. I don't > use > > > docker often, and have never used Dockerhub. So that is a gap in my > > > knowledge that will need to be filled by somebody else's expertise. > > > > > > Before we distribute accumulo-docker code, we need to vote on a > release. > > > Any PMC member can prepare a release candidate and initiate that vote. > > > (I'm willing to do it, once we figure out how the distribution should > > go.) > > > > > > Before we vote, I'd like to us to have some idea of how we will label > > > versions of accumulo-docker releases. Any opinions? > > > > > > After we figure out release versioning and vote, I don't know what > comes > > > next. > > > > > > I believe INFRA has an "organization" for Apache on Dockerhub... but > we'd > > > probably have to put in a ticket. > > > A search on JIRA shows some previous similar issues: > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-18167?jql=project%3DINFRA%20AND%20text~dockerhub > > > > > > Those might be a good starting point for researching how to publish. > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 2:25 PM karthick rn < > [email protected] > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Christopher, > > > > > > > > Following the conversation from PR#12 > > > > <https://github.com/apache/accumulo-docker/pull/12>, I'm interested > to > > > > drive this forward and publish the image to Dockerhub. Let me know > how > > > > do I get in touch with INFRA? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Karthick > > > > > > > > >
