This vote also passes unanimously.
Thanks everybody!

The new target name is 'manager'. I will edit the existing tickets accordingly.

On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 10:41 AM Mike Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 7:20 PM Nathaniel Freeman <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > > On 3 Aug 2020, at 10:21, Jeffrey Zeiberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 10:20 AM Jeffrey Manno <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 10:18 AM Dave Marion <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> +1
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 10:15 AM Adam Lerman <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> +1
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 10:14 AM Owens, Mark <[email protected]>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> +1
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>>> From: Christopher <[email protected]>
> > >>>>> Sent: Monday, August 3, 2020 9:54 AM
> > >>>>> To: accumulo-dev <[email protected]>
> > >>>>> Subject: [VOTE] "Manager" as new name for "master" service
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Based on the feedback on
> > >>>>> https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/1638 , the following two
> > >>> names
> > >>>>> have taken a clear lead in popularity for the new name for the
> > >> service
> > >>>>> currently known as "master": Manager and Coordinator. Of the two,
> > >>>> "Manager"
> > >>>>> is more popular by a very narrow margin.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Please vote on whether to accept "Manager" as the new name for the
> > >>>> service
> > >>>>> currently known as "master" to work towards. Remember, we're only
> > >>> voting
> > >>>> on
> > >>>>> a target name at this time, not a migration path, release plan, or
> > >> any
> > >>>>> specific code changes. Those details can be worked out in future
> > >>> actions.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> My vote is +1
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> This vote will end after Thu 06 Aug 2020 02:00:00 PM UTC (Thu 06 Aug
> > >>> 2020
> > >>>>> 10:00:00 AM EDT / Thu 06 Aug 2020 07:00:00 AM PDT)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Christopher
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >

Reply via email to