+1 On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 12:20 PM Jeffrey Manno <jeffreymann...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 11:57 AM Adam Lerman <aler...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020, 11:08 AM Ed Coleman <d...@etcoleman.com> wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> > > > Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2020 11:08 AM > > > To: accumulo-dev <dev@accumulo.apache.org> > > > Subject: [LAZY][VOTE] Rename the 1.9 branch to 1.10 > > > > > > Hi Accumulo devs, > > > > > > I've heard from a few people that they are confused why we are > developing > > > in a 1.9 branch when we are working towards a 1.10 release. > > > I had intended to wait until we actually release 1.10 to deal with the > > > branch rename as part of the post-release process. However, I now think > > > that it'd be better to clear up this confusion by just renaming the > > branch > > > now, so we can be done with it. > > > > > > I'll go ahead and create a 1.10 maintenance branch from 1.9 so we can > > work > > > out of that instead, and will update any open PRs against that branch. > > > > > > Unless there's an objection within 72 hours, I'll go ahead and delete > the > > > 1.9 branch after that. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Christopher > > > > > > > > >
