Sounds good. On Tue, Sep 22, 2020, 1:37 PM Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote:
> Based on the conversation and direction of this, I think it probably > makes the most sense to just create a new repository under Accumulo > for it to live. > > How about 'accumulo-classloaders' for the repo name? If this is okay, > I can create it later today or tomorrow. > This is just a repo name. This is just a place to collaborate on > classloader code without constraining the scope of the repo's contents > too much. The actual package names and artifactId can be different, if > we want. > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 9:44 AM Dave Marion <dmario...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > [1] contains the initial set of changes to the Accumulo code base that > > defines the new context class loader configuration and deprecates the > > existing VFS ClassLoader objects. [2] contains the new > > ReloadingVFSClassLoader that can be used as the system classloader and a > > ClassLoaderFactory implementation for configuring contexts for tables and > > scans. Both build successfully and I plan on doing some local testing > next. > > Feedback on the design and the code is welcome. > > > > [1] https://github.com/dlmarion/accumulo/pull/2 > > [2] https://github.com/dlmarion/vfs-reloading-classloader > > > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 12:19 PM Dave Marion <dmario...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > I tend to agree with Marc on this. If we need to push out a fix for > the > > > new classloader, then we can do it as needed and not have to rely on > > > another group of people to come to consensus on a release. Of course, > we > > > could maintain a fork of it in that case, but then what's the point? It > > > appears that VFS does have some recent activity [1], but mostly by one > > > person. I'm thinking that we should create a subproject for it and > notify > > > the commons-vfs project of its existence. If they want to copy it and > > > include it in their project, then they can do that. > > > > > > [1] https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-vfs.git;a=shortlog > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 4:48 PM Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > >> Only Marc joined, and we didn't talk about anything that isn't > already in > > >> this proposal, except he did mention how difficult it might be to try > to > > >> maintain the class loader in commons-vfs2, rather than as our own > small > > >> subproject, which is relatively easy. > > >> > > >> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020, 16:11 Dave Marion <dmario...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> > Did anyone join the call? Any notes? > > >> > > > >> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 12:44 PM Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > I just want to remind everybody that I'm available in Slack now to > > >> > > discuss this in the ongoing video call I created in the #accumulo > > >> > > room, if you want to join. > > >> > > > > >> > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 10:41 PM Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org > > > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Also, if anybody is interested in a live video conversation to > > >> discuss > > >> > > > this interactively, I intend to be on Slack on Wednesday > afternoon > > >> > > > (EDT) starting around noon. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 5:30 PM Christopher < > ctubb...@apache.org> > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Hi Accumulo Devs, > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Lately, Dave Marion (Apache ID: dlmarion) has been working on > > >> > > > > prototyping some new class loader concepts for Accumulo that > he > > >> and I > > >> > > > > have discussed, and I wanted to pitch the idea here for > > >> consideration > > >> > > > > for the project. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > # Background: > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Accumulo currently has two classloaders that are instantiated > at > > >> > > > > startup, and which can be used to bootstrap Accumulo > dependencies > > >> (at > > >> > > > > least, those not needed for the classloader code itself). This > > >> allows > > >> > > > > us to use the `general.classpaths`[1] and > > >> > > > > `general.dynamic.classpaths`[2] properties, as well as the > > >> > per-context > > >> > > > > classloaders (`general.vfs.*`[3] and > `table.classpath.context`[4]) > > >> > for > > >> > > > > things like iterator class isolation. Since 2.0.0, we have > > >> deprecated > > >> > > > > `general.classpaths` and `general.dynamic.classpaths`, the > former > > >> > > > > supplanted by the better use of the `CLASSPATH` environment > > >> variable > > >> > > > > (along with much improved scripts in 2.0.0), and the latter > being > > >> > > > > replaceable by a user-provided class loader using the built-in > > >> Java > > >> > > > > property, `java.system.class.loader`[5], at their discretion. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > # The Problem: > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > The main problem with the current code is: complexity. > Accumulo is > > >> > > > > already complex enough without needing to be in the business > of > > >> > > > > developing and supporting complex custom class loading > features, > > >> > > > > especially when users have viable alternatives that can be > better > > >> > > > > supported by independent, dedicated projects. Furthermore, > these > > >> > > > > custom class loaders also have a dependency on commons-vfs2, > which > > >> > has > > >> > > > > been the source of numerous problems and bugs that we have > needed > > >> to > > >> > > > > deal with, and which affect Accumulo, even though they are not > > >> > > > > necessarily bugs in Accumulo itself. This also brings in a > lot of > > >> > > > > optional dependencies that aren't needed by users who don't > rely > > >> on > > >> > > > > these features. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > # The Requirements: > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > In spite of these problems, I believe we still want to enable > the > > >> use > > >> > > > > cases that our classloaders are currently enabling. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Specifically, > > >> > > > > 1) the ability to have separate contexts for iterator class > > >> isolation > > >> > > > > (A/B testing of iterators, updating iterators in a live > system, > > >> > etc.), > > >> > > > > and > > >> > > > > 2) the ability for users to bootstrap their class path from > some > > >> > other > > >> > > > > distributed storage than local disk. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > # The Proposal: > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > 1. Create a new reloading vfs class loader, with similar > > >> > functionality > > >> > > > > as our current two-classloaders that do the reloading and > provide > > >> vfs > > >> > > > > features, that can be easily used as a system class loader, > if the > > >> > > > > user chooses to, and deprecate (for removal in 3.0) the > built-in > > >> > > > > implementations. This class loader could not only be used with > > >> > > > > Accumulo, but it could also be used by any other project that > > >> chooses > > >> > > > > to use it, because it will not have much, if any, dependencies > > >> beyond > > >> > > > > commons-vfs2, and will certainly not depend on Accumulo. > Creating > > >> > this > > >> > > > > separate class loader provides us a path forward to simplify > > >> Accumulo > > >> > > > > by removing these features from Accumulo directly (the > properties > > >> are > > >> > > > > already deprecated), and enabling it to be maintained > > >> independently. > > >> > > > > 2. Create a new class loader factory property in Accumulo, > with > > >> > > > > corresponding SPI interface, for users to provide their own > > >> > > > > implementation of a class loader factory, that can map a > per-table > > >> > > > > "context" to a ClassLoader of the implementation's choosing. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > The result of doing these two things will allow us to more > > >> flexibly > > >> > > > > support user class loading needs, without being directly > > >> responsible > > >> > > > > for class loading implementations inside Accumulo's core > code. All > > >> > the > > >> > > > > same functionality that is available today will continue to > exist, > > >> > but > > >> > > > > will be configured differently. The resulting code in Accumulo > > >> will > > >> > be > > >> > > > > dramatically simpler, as we would no longer have any complex > class > > >> > > > > loading implementations in our code base, and we would no > longer > > >> have > > >> > > > > any direct dependency on commons-vfs2, which has been > problematic. > > >> > > > > Independent implementations may use commons-vfs2, or something > > >> else, > > >> > > > > but will be more easily testable and maintainable as > independent > > >> > > > > projects that are pluggable in Accumulo. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Dave has already been working on prototyping these proposed > > >> changes, > > >> > > > > and it is looking very feasible. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > We are now ready to: > > >> > > > > 1. get feedback on the overall proposal, and > > >> > > > > 2. decide on where to maintain the separate class loader. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > For where to maintain, the options seem to be: A) try to > donate to > > >> > > > > commons-vfs2 OR B) maintain as a new repository, > > >> > > > > accumulo-vfs-classloader. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Note that we have not yet proposed the idea of a user-facing, > > >> > > > > configurable, reloading vfs classloader to the commons-vfs2 > > >> > > > > developers. We wanted to get our own community's feedback on > this > > >> > > > > first. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Please discuss. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, > > >> > > > > Christopher (in collaboration with Dave) > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > [1]: > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > https://accumulo.apache.org/docs/2.x/configuration/server-properties#general_classpaths > > >> > > > > [2]: > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > https://accumulo.apache.org/docs/2.x/configuration/server-properties#general_dynamic_classpaths > > >> > > > > [3]: > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > https://accumulo.apache.org/docs/2.x/configuration/server-properties#general_vfs_context_classpath_prefix > > >> > > > > [4]: > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > https://accumulo.apache.org/docs/2.x/configuration/server-properties#table_classpath_context > > >> > > > > [5]: > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/lang/ClassLoader.html#getSystemClassLoader%E2%80%93 > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >