This vote passes with:

5 +1s, and no other votes

I will track the release tasks on https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/3295


On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 1:44 PM Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1 to this release
>
> I checked:
>
> * Hashes/signatures
> * Source and javadoc jars exist for jars in staging repo
> * The jars in the binary tarball match the jars in the staging repo,
> and were built with the specified commit
> * The source tarball matches the contents of the git branch
> * Unit tests and ITs all pass
>
> I did notice that the source tarball includes the .gitignore files. I
> don't think that used to be the case. I had thought the source tarball
> was built without those files, but it seems not anymore. I don't think
> that's a problem, though... just unexpected to see .gitignore files
> outside the git tree. I wonder if this is a change in the
> apache-source-release-assembly-descriptor that is executed in the
> parent POM, or if it's a change in the default behavior of
> maven-assembly-plugin. I'm not sure.
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:58 PM Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/3287 was identified as a
> > known issue in the documentation. This can be noted in the release
> > notes and fixed along with any 1.10.4 fixes. I'm wrapping up my own
> > testing, and will close the vote soon.
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 7:36 AM Dave Marion <dmario...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks Christopher for setting me straight. This information did enable 
> > > the
> > > build to move beyond the CredentialProviderFactoryShimTest. I'm unable to
> > > get past MiniAccumuloClusterTest though. Two tests timeout for me every
> > > time even when increasing the timeout factor (they both specify a timeout
> > > in the Test annotation). I was able to verify hashes and keys, but I'm
> > > going to refrain from voting as I was really unable to test anything
> > > because of my various issues. I think we should move forward though based
> > > on others' testing and votes.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 7:01 PM Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think a lot of you are getting bugs because you're trying to build
> > > > with both the "hadoop-default" / "hadoop2" and the "hadoop3" profile
> > > > active at the same time, and that's causing dependency resolution
> > > > issues because the classpath is polluted with a bunch of extra stuff
> > > > (which you can see by adding in a `dependency:tree` to the maven
> > > > command).
> > > >
> > > > If you're building using `-Phadoop3`, you should be aware that won't
> > > > de-activate the default profile, which is set up for Hadoop 2. The
> > > > correct way to build using the Hadoop 3 profile is with
> > > > `-Dhadoop.profile=3`, which activates the Hadoop 3 profile and
> > > > de-activates the default (Hadoop 2) profile at the same time:
> > > >
> > > > `mvn clean package -Dtest=CredentialProviderFactoryShimTest
> > > > -Dhadoop.profile=3`
> > > >
> > > > When built correctly, I cannot reproduce the errors seen, but I can
> > > > reproduce it when I use the incorrect command.
> > > >
> > > > Hadoop itself ships with commons-beanutils, and this credential
> > > > provider code is a Hadoop-specific feature. We don't have a dependency
> > > > on it for our code and don't ship beanutils in our tarball. This isn't
> > > > an issue in production, as long as you have your Hadoop libs on your
> > > > classpath correctly. The reason we use commons-configuration 1.6 is
> > > > because that converges with what Hadoop uses for [2.6.5,3.0). So, I
> > > > don't think we should change the version of that. We do ship it in our
> > > > tarball, because Hadoop 3.0.3 and later use commons-configuration2, so
> > > > commons-configuration needs to be on the classpath when using Hadoop
> > > > 3, but we don't want the version to conflict with what Hadoop 2 is
> > > > using, so we ship the same version. We can expect commons-beanutils to
> > > > be there, though, since Hadoop ships that in all its releases.
> > > >
> > > > We have enough votes that I could close the vote now, but I'll give it
> > > > another day for anybody who ran into issues to re-test with the
> > > > correct command, if they want, now that they have the updated
> > > > information.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 3:21 PM Mark Owens <jmoapa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > If I update the pom's with the commons-configuration changes 
> > > > > suggested by
> > > > > Dave in a previous post, I can successfully run the Sunny profile 
> > > > > tests
> > > > > with both Hadoop 2 and Hadoop 3.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 1:16 PM Daniel Roberts <ddani...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Yes, I changed the memory settings last week and was able to pass 
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > ExamplesIT.testScansWithInterference and
> > > > > > ExamplesIT.testIsolatedScansWithInterference
> > > > > > without issue. Given these environmental tweaks, do we have a
> > > > documented
> > > > > > minimum machine spec that we expect the release tests to pass on?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 1:00 PM Christopher Shannon <
> > > > > > christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > The test failure for ExamplesIT.testScansWithInterference is 
> > > > > > > likely
> > > > from
> > > > > > > out of memory. See https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/3281
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 12:21 PM Dominic Garguilo <
> > > > > > > dominic.gargu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > After running
> > > > > > > > mvn clean verify -Phadoop3,sunny
> > > > > > > > I am consistently seeing the following:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [ERROR]
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > org.apache.accumulo.core.conf.CredentialProviderFactoryShimTest.extractFromHdfs
> > > > > > > > >  Time elapsed: 3.605 s  <<< ERROR!
> > > > > > > > > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> > > > > > > > > org/apache/commons/beanutils/BeanIntrospector
> > > > > > > > > at
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > org.apache.accumulo.core.conf.CredentialProviderFactoryShimTest.extractFromHdfs(CredentialProviderFactoryShimTest.java:185)
> > > > > > > > > Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
> > > > > > > > > org.apache.commons.beanutils.BeanIntrospector
> > > > > > > > > at
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > org.apache.accumulo.core.conf.CredentialProviderFactoryShimTest.extractFromHdfs(CredentialProviderFactoryShimTest.java:185)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This test passes consistently when run in my IDE but fails every
> > > > time
> > > > > > > when
> > > > > > > > running the mentioned maven command.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 6:04 PM Dave Marion 
> > > > > > > > <dmario...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > *mvn clean verify -Phadoop3,sunny* failed in ExamplesIT with 
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > aforementioned changes. Specifically,
> > > > > > > > ExamplesIT.testScansWithInterference
> > > > > > > > > failed with a server error when closing the batch writer. No
> > > > further
> > > > > > > > > information in the logs.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 5:06 PM Dave Marion 
> > > > > > > > > <dmario...@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Updating commons-configuration from 1.6 to 1.10 did the 
> > > > > > > > > > trick I
> > > > > > > think.
> > > > > > > > > > Versions 1.7, 1.8, and 1.9 had compilation issues. I'm not
> > > > veto-ing
> > > > > > > > > because
> > > > > > > > > > other people have built with the hadoop3 profile even though
> > > > more
> > > > > > > than
> > > > > > > > > one
> > > > > > > > > > of us have had an issue. Here are the changes I made to get 
> > > > > > > > > > me
> > > > past
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > CredentialProviderFactoryShimTest test failure in conf using
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > hadoop3
> > > > > > > > > > profile.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/core/pom.xml b/core/pom.xml
> > > > > > > > > > index 163a1c062f..2aad10486a 100644
> > > > > > > > > > --- a/core/pom.xml
> > > > > > > > > > +++ b/core/pom.xml
> > > > > > > > > > @@ -201,6 +201,8 @@
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > <allow>org[.]apache[.]hadoop[.]mapred[.](FileAlreadyExistsException|InvalidJobConfException)</allow>
> > > > > > > > > >                  <!-- allow lexicoders to throw iterator
> > > > exceptions
> > > > > > > -->
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > <allow>org[.]apache[.]accumulo[.]core[.]iterators[.]ValueFormatException</allow>
> > > > > > > > > > +                <!-- allow commons-configuration for
> > > > deprecated
> > > > > > > > > > ClientConfiguration constructor -->
> > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > <allow>org[.]apache[.]commons[.]configuration[.]Configuration</allow>
> > > > > > > > > >                </allows>
> > > > > > > > > >              </configuration>
> > > > > > > > > >            </execution>
> > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/pom.xml b/pom.xml
> > > > > > > > > > index 854443da2d..2193b46b54 100644
> > > > > > > > > > --- a/pom.xml
> > > > > > > > > > +++ b/pom.xml
> > > > > > > > > > @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@
> > > > > > > > > >        <dependency>
> > > > > > > > > >          <groupId>commons-configuration</groupId>
> > > > > > > > > >          <artifactId>commons-configuration</artifactId>
> > > > > > > > > > -        <version>1.6</version>
> > > > > > > > > > +        <version>1.10</version>
> > > > > > > > > >        </dependency>
> > > > > > > > > >        <dependency>
> > > > > > > > > >          <groupId>commons-io</groupId>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 12:16 PM Dave Marion <
> > > > dmario...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >> From what I can tell:
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> 1. commons-configuration:1.6 has a commons-beanutils:1.7.0
> > > > > > > dependency
> > > > > > > > > >> 2. hadoop-common:3.0.3 has a commons-beanutils:1.9.3
> > > > dependency,
> > > > > > > > > >> hadoop-common:2.6.5 has no such dependency
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> Hadoop 3.0.3 is failing because the commons-beanutils:1.9.3
> > > > > > > dependency
> > > > > > > > > >> must not be on the classpath for the test. I have no idea 
> > > > > > > > > >> why
> > > > this
> > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > >> failing on my machine and not for others. I'm also seeing
> > > > general
> > > > > > > > > slowness
> > > > > > > > > >> building 1.10.3 on my machine, but not building other git
> > > > > > branches.
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 8:24 AM Dave Marion <
> > > > dmario...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >>> I built the source tarball using the hadoop3 profile again
> > > > and
> > > > > > > > > >>> encountered the issue below. The version of hadoop (3.0.3)
> > > > has
> > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > changed,
> > > > > > > > > >>> so I assume that this is related to a change in our
> > > > dependencies.
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>> [ERROR] Tests run: 10, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0,
> > > > Time
> > > > > > > > > elapsed:
> > > > > > > > > >>> 3.856 s <<< FAILURE! - in
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > org.apache.accumulo.core.conf.CredentialProviderFactoryShimTest
> > > > > > > > > >>> [ERROR]
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > org.apache.accumulo.core.conf.CredentialProviderFactoryShimTest.extractFromHdfs
> > > > > > > > > >>>  Time elapsed: 1.186 s  <<< ERROR!
> > > > > > > > > >>> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> > > > > > > > > >>> org/apache/commons/beanutils/BeanIntrospector
> > > > > > > > > >>> at
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > org.apache.accumulo.core.conf.CredentialProviderFactoryShimTest.extractFromHdfs(CredentialProviderFactoryShimTest.java:185)
> > > > > > > > > >>> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
> > > > > > > > > >>> org.apache.commons.beanutils.BeanIntrospector
> > > > > > > > > >>> at
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > org.apache.accumulo.core.conf.CredentialProviderFactoryShimTest.extractFromHdfs(CredentialProviderFactoryShimTest.java:185)
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>> On Sun, Apr 9, 2023 at 11:41 AM Jeffrey Manno <
> > > > > > > > > jeffreymann...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>> +1
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>> I did run into a few flaky tests but none seem to 
> > > > > > > > > >>>> warrant a
> > > > > > > stoppage
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > >>>> this release candidate. Two common ones are
> > > > SuspendTabletsIT and
> > > > > > > > > >>>> DeleteTableDuringSplitIT.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>> Other checks I did:
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>    - Ran the entire test suite, along with sunny day 
> > > > > > > > > >>>> tests.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>    - Verified checksums.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>    - Did some small ingest testing with agitation.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>> On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 9:18 AM Christopher Shannon <
> > > > > > > > > >>>> christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > +1 (binding), LGTM
> > > > > > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > Some of the things I did for verification/testing 
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > locally:
> > > > > > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > * Validated signatures and checksums
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > * Verified license and notice files in archives
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > * Verified source license headers with 'mvn
> > > > apache-rat:check'
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > * Built and ran all the sunny integration tests
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > * Started up using Uno to make sure everything started
> > > > > > correctly
> > > > > > > > > >>>> (also ran
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > a couple scans, etc)
> > > > > > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 4:23 PM Christopher <
> > > > > > ctubb...@apache.org
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > Accumulo Developers,
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > Please consider the following candidate for Apache
> > > > Accumulo
> > > > > > > > > 1.10.3.
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > Git Commit:
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >     733863638d85d0109d217da7ea5f36f5e483e207
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > Branch:
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >     1.10.3-rc1
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > If this vote passes, a gpg-signed tag will be created
> > > > using:
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >     git tag -f -s -m 'Apache Accumulo 1.10.3'
> > > > rel/1.10.3 \
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >     733863638d85d0109d217da7ea5f36f5e483e207
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > Staging repo:
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1100
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > Source (official release artifact):
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1100/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.10.3/accumulo-1.10.3-src.tar.gz
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > Binary:
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1100/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.10.3/accumulo-1.10.3-bin.tar.gz
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > Append ".asc" to download the cryptographic signature
> > > > for a
> > > > > > > > given
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > artifact.
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > (You can also append ".sha1" or ".md5" instead in 
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > order
> > > > to
> > > > > > > > verify
> > > > > > > > > >>>> the
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > checksums
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > generated by Maven to verify the integrity of the 
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > Nexus
> > > > > > > > repository
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > staging area.)
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > Signing keys are available at
> > > > > > > > > >>>> https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > (Expected fingerprint:
> > > > > > > 8CC4F8A2B29C2B040F2B835D6F0CDAE700B6899D)
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > In addition to the tarballs and their signatures, the
> > > > > > > following
> > > > > > > > > >>>> checksum
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > files will be added to the dist/release SVN area 
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > after
> > > > > > > release:
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > accumulo-1.10.3-src.tar.gz.sha512 will contain:
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > SHA512 (accumulo-1.10.3-src.tar.gz) =
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > 436707da7424ea1b7993355d70747068264276234a4772f9da3866a638ad7860a754436f34ab2108e54801cced67f00ca2cfe0f46dfb80f2d7609b7b7112045e
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > accumulo-1.10.3-bin.tar.gz.sha512 will contain:
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > SHA512 (accumulo-1.10.3-bin.tar.gz) =
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > 36e6795ad3720ba72fc9f4ddabf45f6d67cdc77658a181733fa2c47bfd3799f123b8840a79b538b8504a7b4bdc97fd0b52efab790395a5e022a897bc18405d0c
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > Release notes (in progress) can be found at:
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > https://accumulo.staged.apache.org/release/accumulo-1.10.3
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > Release testing instructions:
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > https://accumulo.apache.org/contributor/verifying-release
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > Please vote one of:
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > [ ] +1 - I have verified and accept...
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > [ ] +0 - I have reservations, but not strong enough 
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > to
> > > > vote
> > > > > > > > > >>>> against...
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > [ ] -1 - Because..., I do not accept...
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > ... these artifacts as the 1.10.3 release of Apache
> > > > > > Accumulo.
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > This vote will remain open until at least Mon Apr 10
> > > > > > 08:30:00
> > > > > > > PM
> > > > > > > > > UTC
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > 2023.
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > (Mon Apr 10 04:30:00 PM EDT 2023 / Mon Apr 10 
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > 01:30:00
> > > > PM
> > > > > > PDT
> > > > > > > > > 2023)
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > Voting can continue after this deadline until the
> > > > release
> > > > > > > > manager
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > sends an email ending the vote.
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > Thanks!
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > P.S. Hint: download the whole staging repo with
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >     wget -erobots=off -r -l inf -np -nH \
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1100/
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >     # note the trailing slash is needed
> > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >

Reply via email to