Hello John, I totally agree that Confluence 4.0 is a very nice wiki. At my daytime job we use it a lot and I especially like the new WYSIWYG editor. I also see the problems with the AutoExport plugin that the infra guys have, so I can understand that they decided to gradually phase out Confluence as a way to generate project websites.
As a wiki, I think we should keep it, and it can be a great way to collaborate on all kinds of documentation. Greetings, Marcel On Jan 5, 2012, at 14:13 PM, John Dunlap wrote: > I'm a big fan of confluence, especially now that 4.0 has been released, but > as I'm not the one doing the work I think you should be free to do whatever > you feel is best. Go for it. :) > > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>wrote: > >> +1 >> >> no problem for me ;) >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> >> On 01/05/2012 02:09 AM, Marcel Offermans wrote: >> >>> I brought this up a couple of days ago, and got no objections (or other >>> reactions). For now I'm going to take that as a "go ahead" to request a >>> site on the new Apache CMS and start phasing out our use of Confluence as a >>> website (I think it does make sense to keep it as a wiki, but feel free to >>> disagree). >>> >>> In case you're not yet familiar with the Apache CMS, here's a FAQ (that >>> points to the documentation as well): >>> http://wiki.apache.org/**general/ApacheCMSFAQ<http://wiki.apache.org/general/ApacheCMSFAQ> >>> >>> Greetings, Marcel >>> >>> >>> >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> jbono...@apache.org >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>
