-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all,
Having some real life experience with BndTools (done several projects with it), I'll also post my ramblings on this proposal. I favor migrating away from Maven to BndTools. I do not think it is practical to support both build-tools. One of the reasons being that BndTools allows you to have multiple bundles in a single Eclipse project. It would mean that we can have less projects, making the project certainly more tangible and comprehensible from a source perspective. BndTools also makes OSGi bundles a 1st class citizen in Eclipse, allowing you to run them directly from Eclipse as you would do with non-OSGi projects. This _certainly_ will increase development speed, IMO. Regards, Jan Willem On 6/28/12 11:45 AM, Tang Yong wrote: > Hello Rafal, > >> From my experience, Bndtools + maven-bundle-plugin combination >> works quite well. You don't need to migrate away from Maven to >> Ant in order to use Bndtools. > > Real Case is that: > > how to import the maven-built large project into bndtools including > mave n repo's setting. > > BTW: which version of bndtools are you using? Version 1.0.0? > >> mine :) I can share some experiences/tips if anyone is >> interested. > I want to know very much! Thanks! > > -Best Regrads -Tang > > Rafał Krzewski wrote: >> From my experience, Bndtools + maven-bundle-plugin combination >> works quite well. You don't need to migrate away from Maven to >> Ant in order to use Bndtools. There are some missing bits, like >> GAV -> BSN/BV mapping, Bndtools release action -> >> maven-release-plugin integration but other than that, it works >> remarkably smoothly, at least for the little toy projects of mine >> :) I can share some experiences/tips if anyone is interested. >> >> regards, Rafał >> >> On 06/28/2012 10:52 AM, Tang Yong wrote: >>> Hi Marcel, >>> >>> Bndtools is indeed a good tool for building osgi bundle, >>> however, I want to know whether there are good experences for >>> mirgrating a large project(eg. ace, glassfish) which has used >>> maven for building because the current release of bndtools >>> seemed not to be friend to maven. >>> >>> -Best Regard! --Tang >>> >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>>> Hi Marcel, >>>> >>>> as discussed this morning, it sounds like a good idea. I took >>>> a look on BndTools and it's interesting, fast, and stable >>>> (regarding the small tests that I did ;)). >>>> >>>> I would be glad to help around that ! >>>> >>>> Regards JB >>>> - -- Met vriendelijke groeten | Kind regards Jan Willem Janssen | Software Architect +31 631 765 814 /My world is:/ Luminis Technologies B.V. IJsselburcht 3 6825 BS Arnhem +31 88 586 46 30 http://www.luminis-technologies.com http://www.luminis.eu KvK (CoC) 09 16 28 93 BTW (VAT) NL8169.78.566.B.01 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJP7DB1AAoJEKF/mP2eHDc4SxkP/0ev2vnQfWGrfRi5R717YUGb eej0HU4vViETYPwRpfRe4HkH7x0o5WZI5UxtZuQqlW3s+LRa7QRyUyoeh0gUpiOB n8CfIEjlxfL4n5kOdKoo9hpcvWx0s65ZfjXKQQ7hRPf+1UqTMXgcw0YfDsUoa9RO Z3CKR4OhtHvHRklwLBgZIkxbrRBxULhGuDXPpC35IMvYbq2ptlme1O9Fo9VeosDX yFWuak38+BF2I5xg+lDJIgX+05ijtYd8IC2nTguAFzDuxElaZlOr9R13C1colesk LIWd5yxbeDgS05Y6DnCdE012HBPtdKbEdkiTs5d5tjC7Ms0rU8y5lvUEzOAJCLnR hnp3LiDlVFhxzBRs4ldKChv9YCcUhRhCbyDMH4SMxyGzpuZywErZ2fMklqZk7XS8 KqkKX8teglNMQz1EAbUlI8i9ju8IPnUSkx04Pdxvw8ZZi9ogAcdNBMf79w4PnHS/ oOFkXzlvvv8abkAtv9p/ecoKy+7KJKpBEZfEISug3D7j5YNoM8ZnVB+R9m1oMXvo Zh/9FgDG4xkcrETq/JELWWS81XNaapD6o4ypYKV6HLzCEuJzsiqWFHtmNnJHa5jE ttO9ELu5ncXFDaBHzgwgrPwe/USa18QW+9Lp/xqtUPK0DRV8OLdNFqmQ70jfV7Bk /fxYmGDuZCSkE1H9lXyl =OEYH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
