Hi, 2012/7/15 Marcel Offermans <marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl>: > You no doubt have followed the recent discussions within Apache about doing > releases and how source releases are the only "official" ones (since > consensus was that voting on binary releases made little sense as they're > hard to review). > > I think it is therefore probably a lot easier to go to a single source > release of ACE as a whole. Within that source release we will then have > multiple bundles, and each is versioned independently. The same goes for > exported packages. We actually use "packageinfo" files in exported packages > to ensure consistent versioning of those. So of course not everything will > change every release. I see this in a similar way to for example a release of > the OSGi specifications: there is an R4.2, R4.3, etc but within that release, > some specs and packages will have changed, others might not. > > After voting on a source release we still intend to provide binaries of > course, and we only need to make available bundes that have changed. At the > same time, we also want to provide binaries of a complete ACE server for > example, and maybe others. > Hmm, but wouldn't that mean that we have to do a full (source) release for a simple module fix?
Regards Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org
