Great point. So should we try to keep these CMS/NMS spaces implementation agnostic?
On 2/19/07, Mittler, Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Excellent! I've been meaning to do something like that for CMS, but you beat me to it! :) BTW, I'd eventually like to start versioning these APIs separate from their implementations. This way, others could make similar clients for ActiveMQ (or any MOM, really) that is based the same API. > -----Original Message----- > From: James Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 1:08 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: mini sites for NMS and CMS projects > > I've setup little mini-sites for users of NMS or CMS > > http://activemq.apache.org/cms/ > http://activemq.apache.org/nms/ > > so we can document each download of these projects & keep the C# or > C++ specific code & user guides separate from the Java stuff. > > -- > > James > ------- > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ >
-- Regards, Hiram Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
