Its purely a case that the Stomp+JMS came later. We really could do
with revving Stomp to 1.0 or 1.1 to tidy up a few headers we'd used.
I think the latest ActiveMQ should support the cleaner header names
from Stomp+JMS (if it doesn't we can fix it easily).
Fair enough.
Would it be a good idea to actually somehow embed StompConnect?
That way we're not duplicating effort...
Hmm, it would probably bring performance down by forcing stomp messages
to also go through JMS.
I'll take a closer look at the code and see what I can do.
Thanks,
Alvaro
