It should not be the case. I just added a test case to verify that
interceptor1 is being called before interceptor2, and it seems that
everything is fine.
see:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq/camel/trunk/camel-core/src/test/java/org/apache/camel/builder/InterceptorBuilderTest.java
Did you have a test case that shows this is broken?
On 4/18/07, dr.jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In this example:
from("queue:a")
.intercept()
.add(interceptor1)
.add(interceptor2)
.target()
.to("queue:b");
the interceptors process a passing message in the order:
interceptor2.process(), interceptor1.process()
Is that the intended behavior?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-camel--InterceptorProcessor-tf3604072s2354.html#a10069237
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
