BTW, has anyone run the same test with a Java client to verify that it is indeed an OpenWire thing and not an activemq-cpp specific thing?
> -----Original Message----- > From: Teemu Torma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 6:43 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: AMQCPP Openwire much slower than Stomp? > > On Thursday 19 April 2007, Timothy Bish wrote: > > As of last night I have submitted all the changes to implement > > allowing TCP_NODELAY to be set, along with some unit tests. If you > > haven't grabbed trunk in a day or so, you won't have all those > > changes. > > > > We could default it to on if we find its at the root of some of the > > performance issues. > > +1 for making it default, also on the broker side. > > I haven't seen any major performance issues apart from > TCP_NODELAY not being enabled. And only scenario I can think > of when Nagle's algorithm helps is sending asynchronously > small messages, which I think is not the most common usage. > > Teemu >
