On 6/14/07, Endre Stølsvik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
> On 6/14/07, Endre Stølsvik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So if you think it'd be more consistent we could go from
>
> http://activemq.apache.org/schema/activemq-core
> http://activemq.apache.org/schema/activemq-core-5.0.xsd
>
> to
>
> http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core
> http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core/activemq-core-5.0.xsd
>
> ditto for activemq-ra, activemq-jpa et al. I guess the namespace would
> be a tad shorter, at the expense of the URL being a fair bit longer
Doesn't make a huge difference, but I think the latter is nicer.
You could have called "core" for "mq", "amq" or something. Core sounds
like something you have to add something to, or else it'll not work.
Like "kernel" - ain't much of an OS with just the kernel, right?
Yeah - its a tad late for that now; its been around for years - but
its basically the core library (the main stuff you need as opposed to
additional stuff).
> The only downside is when folks go to
> http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core it'd actually contain all
> versions of all schemas; I don't know an easy way to fix that :).
But that's just perfect, isn't it?!
You probably don't wanna see all the versions of the "ra" module when
looking in http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core. Thats what I mean
:).
If someone fancies writing a shell script to slurp up the files from
the 2 directories...
http://activemq.apache.org/schema/
http://activemq.apache.org/snapshot-schema/
and making a tree like...
core/
activemq-core-4.1.1.xsd
activemq-core-5.0-SNAPSHOT.xsd
ra/
activemq-ra-4.1.1.xsd
activemq-ra-5.0-SNAPSHOT.xsd
I'll happily deploy it for ya :)
--
James
-------
http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
