Any chance I can get someone to look at
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1270 before the release?

BTW, is the web site versioned?  There are some typos on the contributors
page http://activemq.apache.org/contributing.html .

Dennis Byrne

On 6/6/07, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Looks like a good idea to me.  Please create a JIRA issue for this so
> that it makes it into the change notes.
>
> On 6/2/07, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm putting together a REST adapter for that will run w/in
> activemessaging
> > [1] .  The activemessaging gateway polls the broker (via the ajax
> servlet
> > behind /demo/amq) and dispatches messages to ruby consumers.  The
> > dispatching logic requires the destination name to be somewhere in the
> > response.  Do any of you have an objection to changing the demo so
> that the
> > destination name is in a response header?  I would prefer this to be
> in the
> > header rather than the body so that the adapter could be used to
> consume
> > from other REST services w/out being tied to the details of the body
> > format.  For the same reason, I'd like to move the destination name
> from the
> > body of the POST requests to an HTTP header as well, so that rails
> > application developers do not need to code this into the bodies of
> > to-be-sent-messages.
> >
> > I'm using a three day old apache-activemq-4.2-SNAPSHOT .
> >
> > [1] http://code.google.com/p/activemessaging/wiki/ActiveMessaging
> >
> > --
> > Dennis Byrne
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>



--
Dennis Byrne




--
Dennis Byrne

Reply via email to