On 7/10/07, bobsponge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello James,
I need two or more brokers working at the same time in the same machine
because the application is composed of several machines (nodes). Every node
belongs to a group. In general data is transferred between nodes from the
same group, no problem. But a node can bind to another group so the same
node can communicates with two (or more) groups. The information must
separately persists in this node so two brokers are needed, because of the
persistence issues...
I still don't get it; why 2 brokers in the same JVM on the same box?
Usually for high performance a broker persists to the local hard
drive; so I don't understand the benefit from having 2 different
brokers writing to 2 different directories (or even different DBs)
I tried to configure the brokers with different names building an URI like
this: tcp://localhost:50000?broker.brokerName=broker1 , but it didn't work
at all.
You configure the broker names in the activemq.xml. See the brokerName
atttribute in the one that comes with the binary distro
--
James
-------
http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
