On Aug 3, 2007, at 5:16 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Is there any reason why the extra resource adapter configuration
properties are not properly defined?
only required properties are required in the xml.
that's not my understanding of the j2ca spec. Do you know of a
javaee app server that only uses the ra.xml and not a vendor plan?
It was my understanding that the ra.xml should list all of the
configurable bits, so that information could be presented to the user
in a generic ra configuration view to tweak all of the goodies. Not
sure how one might do that unless the ra.xml defined all of its
configurable bits.
Is there a reason why you don't want to add them? Seems like a good
idea to me to put them in there... but who knows I have been wrong
before :-P
--jason
