+1. Am liking the new structure too On 29/10/2007, Jim Gomes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think my vote technically counts, but I like that renaming. Makes > things very easy to match up and is consistent. > > On 10/29/07, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Ok.. The code has been moved and it seems to build fine using the > > VS2005 project files. The build methods still need to get updated. > > But while we are re-orging this stuff..I think it might be a good time > > to bing the module naming conventions to match up. > > > > Right Now: > > * NMS module uses the namespace Apache.NMS and produces a NMS.dll. > > * NMS.ActiveMQ module uses the namespace Apache.ActiveMQ and produces > > a NMS.ActiveMQ.dll. > > * NMS.MSMQ module uses the namespace Apache.MSMQ and produces a > > NMS.MSMQ.dll. > > * NMS.EMS module uses the namespace Apache.TibcoEMS and produces a > > NMS.EMS.dll. > > > > I propose that we make the module name, namespace, and dll names > > match. Those being: > > Apache.NMS, Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ, Apache.NMS.MSMQ, and Apache.NMS.EMS > > > > Any objections?? > > >
-- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://open.iona.com
