Hi, I have just realised that in my POJO I am not using auto ack session = connection.createSession(true, Session.SESSION_TRANSACTED);
Hiram Chirino wrote: > > Hi, > > Are your using auto acking or are you manually acking the messages? > Manually acking the messages is the only way to garantee that no > message loss will occur. > > > On Nov 29, 2007 6:05 AM, jawed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> Re: Loosing messages using the stomp feature in activemq 4.1.1 >> >> 1. I am using activemq 4.1.1 as my broker and a POJO as my consumer >> 2. I am sending messages from a php stomp client taken from >> https://svn.codehaus.org/stomp/trunk/php/ >> >> Scenario: >> I am sending messages from the php client using the stomp protocol to my >> activemq broker. After sending all messages I then run my consumer, only >> to >> find some of the messages are being consumed. It seems to happen when I >> send >> three or more messages, and the messages that are lost is random i.e. the >> lost messages do not follow a sequence. Is this a known issue? >> >> Also, I was wondering if turning on the persistence feature from the php >> client would guarantee delivery, if so, how can I turn on messaging >> persistence from the php client using the header properties, is it a >> string >> if so what string or an object if so which object? >> >> Thanks for your time >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/stomp-php-client-using-activemq-4.1.1-tf4896391s2354.html#a14023401 >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > > -- > Regards, > Hiram > > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com > > Open Source SOA > http://open.iona.com > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/stomp-php-client-using-activemq-4.1.1-tf4896391s2354.html#a14029869 Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
